This open letter/essay was forwarded to NZ academics on the occasion of the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 crime.
It reports on the draft findings from Professor Leroy Hulsey and associates' Alaska Fairbanks University WTC7 evaluation study. WTC7 was part of the World Trade Center complex demolished in spectacular fashion 11 September 2001.
The secondary conclusion of their study is that "the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building."
Implication is that an hitherto unknown agency was employed to demolish the buildings removing all the core columns. One can speculate about what that was. When one watches video of the WTC7 demolition captured at the moment of the free-fall collapse and compares that with a controlled demolition of other similar buildings one could reach no other conclusion than “the building's demise was as a result of planned demolition by whatever method.”
Demolition charges used at WTC 7 undermine the US Government narrative in respect the 9/11 attack. That in turn creates doubt in respect to the pretext for the war on terror, its merit and its justification under rule of law.
I urged our scientific leaders to take the time to consider the contents of the paper and act to ensure the world is moved toward a just and sustainable tomorrow. The paper asks how NZ can support militarism and seek cooperation for climate action as these appear to be opposed or contrary objectives.
A followup media release was distributed to NZ news media organisations and is included at the end of this blog post (edit 6:20pm Thursday 12 September).
On behalf of 9/11 researchers and NZ 9/11, I've taken the opportunity to take an installation to the NZ Parliament to mark the 9/11 anniversary and featuring the WTC7 study findings.
NZ
Academy - 9/11, Militarism, Climate - will you promote truth or lies?
From: Greg Rzesniowiecki, public advocate
Dear Member of the NZ Academy,
This is an open letter/essay to NZ academics who work in the science, politics and communications/media faculties particularly those in environmental science (climate related), engineering and physical sciences, international affairs and journalism.
Please
note that the World Trade Center building 7 (WTC7) evaluation study
has released its draft findings.
Also
note that there is little reporting of this important fact in any
mainstream media news or journal.
9/11
was the launchpad for the global war on terror (GWoT).
WTC7 evaluation
Professor
Leroy Hulsey and associates from Alaska Fairbanks University were
contracted to undertake a study, WTC7 evaluation. The World Trade
Center (WTC) in New York was demolished as a result of the 9/11 crime
which occurred 11 September 2001. WTC7 (World Trade Center building
7) was demolished at 5:20pm in the afternoon many hours after the
remainder of the WTC towers and plaza were catastrophically levelled.
WTC7 was not struck by a plane nor was any official explanation
proffered for its demise until several years later.
The
WTC7 evaluation draft findings were published Tuesday 3 September
2019:
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Summary of the study findings are twofold;
The
principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the
collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and
private engineering firms that studied the collapse.
The
secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a
global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every
column in the building.
Whilst
the findings might be considered controversial in some official
circles of expertise insulated from common sense, a disinterested
observer can quickly
ascertain the facts of the matter through the use of their ocular
sense, and applied logic - following videos are of WTC7's demolition
and its comparison to a technique known as controlled demolition:
Our Shared Planetary Reality
My
thesis
is that;
“there
is no global solution to the climate change challenge to be found or
brokered whilst the world is in a state of military tension or
engaged in endless hostilities (global
war on terror or similar).”
To
obtain the necessary changes in behaviour; international, national,
society, community and individual the planet needs an improved
attitude from its opinion leaders and power brokers. To move in the
required direction the world needs encouragement through messages,
stories and narratives which foster cooperation as opposed to
competition and winner take all notions of success, we need peaceful
conditions not more tension, aggression and war. Messages promoting
hopelessness
as the only sane reality whilst covertly missing the militarism
element do not encourage the ambitious undertakings necessary to move
the world in the correct direction.
In
support of my thesis I assert;
”it
is necessary for the New Zealand state to do all that is within its
power to obtain the requisite cooperation so that its efforts
including through the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment
Bill are not wasted.”
New
Zealand's government and academic experts proselytise the nation's
inhabitants to alter their behaviour to meet arbitrary greenhouse gas
emission targets. However, the Government and the academy hasn't done
the hard yards on the international stage nor altered their behaviour
and relations
with other nations and institutions who do not share NZ's stated
values
and commitment to increase global sustainability.
The
trend is toward 4 degree C increase in average global temperature by
the conclusion of this century unless appropriate mitigation is
implemented moving the planet's energy system away from fossil fuels,
and restoration of permanent forest cover to ensure a reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions.
Drastic
times and intractable problems require drastic action for redemption.
What to do?
Is
it preferable to do a token or half hearted effort and fail,
or go for gold?
Learn from history?
The
art of the historian is to assemble stories about events and the
personalities that contributed to these. Historians invariably ask a
question; “how did this come from that?”
The
industrial revolution is the story of innovation, mechanisation,
automation and carbon based fuels; coal, oil and natural gas. The
modern global civilisation is enabled through energy and feedstock
for many consumer and industrial products from the oil/energy
industry. Combined oil, coal and gas account for 80% of global energy
consumption and will for the foreseeable future. The most ambitious
see these contribute over 60%
of global energy needs at 2040. Realists see the fossil fuel share
staying above 70% to 2040.
We
are two decades into the third millennium.
At
the dawn of this new epoch a seminal event occurred that we all know
as 9/11. Historians know that 11 September has featured prior, the
coup
against Chilean
President Salvador Allende just one example, and most likely will
again. Through the lens of history one can discover patterns of
behaviour and events.
Each
event in history has a story which arises from the competing
narratives offered to define the event or massage its perception for
particular or mass audiences.
9/11 history's choke point at the new millennium
New
York certainly chocked
on the dust
from the pulverised concrete, steel, office equipment and linings -
110 stories in each WTC tower, 47 in WTC7 and between 8 and 22 in the
rest of the complex buildings severly damaged, destroyed or partly on
that fate filled day.
The
9/11
event narrative
was sold to the world as an act of terrorism by 19 mostly Saudi
Arabian terrorists who (allegedly)
boarded 4 planes, hijacked them and struck key assets in the US,
notably the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in
Washington DC.
That
terrorist narrative promoted by the US authorities was solidified in
quick time and without a forensic investigation into the crime
scenes, at New York, Washington DC or Pennsylvania. Within a month
the US declared war on the nation of Afghanistan.
Afghanistan
was invaded following a shock and awe bombing campaign commencing 7
October 2001. Iraq had been in the US's sights since the 1990 Kuwait
invasion. 9/11 provided the pretext and it too was subjected to
similar shock and awe against the metropolis of Baghdad and invasion
from 19 March 2003.
The
Global War
on Terror
was launched
off the back of the 9/11 event. Terrorism
continues to be the motivating factor to justify outrageous military
budgets at everyone's expense.
What about the 9/11 criminal investigation?
Many
people; including relatives of the 9/11 crime victims, first
responders, independent observers, experts in intelligence, security,
demolition and munitions, and a few journalists raised questions
about the 9/11 narrative promoted by the US Government. They sought
and made calls for an independent and full investigation of the
attack.
The
US Government and President George W Bush administration resisted
those calls for an investigation until 2002, when they commissioned
an inquiry subsequently known as the 9/11 Commission
which completed its investigation and released it findings
in 2004. It ought be noted that the Commissioners
acknowledged
publicly
that they were lied
to by US authorities. President Bush and Vice President Cheney
provided their story to the 9/11 Commission in very restricted
form whereby Bush and Cheney agreed to meet privately with the chair
and vice chair, but, not to meet with all members, according to the
chairman, Thomas H. Kean.
https://www.davegranlund.com/cartoons/2004/04/29/bush-cheney-at-9-11-panel/
It
is also noteworthy that despite the 9/11 Commission findings in
respect to the alleged hijackers,
many
lived
past 11 September 2001, which precludes them being on the alleged
hijacked planes, despite what the 9/11 Commissioners were told by US
authorities in their testimony.
What about the 9/11 forensic examination for clues as to what was causal?
Within
days of the 9/11 attack, contracts
were entered into with demolition companies for the clean up of the
World Trade Center site. The clean up proceeded without a formal
forensic
examination
of the physical evidence.
The
destroyed World Trade Center site became known as “Ground Zero.”
The workers involved in the clean up were Ground Zero workers and
they completed the cleanup of a million tonnes of debris in about 6
months, despite the adverse environment.
They faced enormous obstacles including persistent
hotspots
that fumed and gassed-off until December
2001 despite the Ground Zero clean up management applying
enormous volumes of liquid suppressant to assist the cooling of the
subterranean hotspots.
The
subterranean
hotspots
are an anomaly along with many incongruent facts, that ought to have
received forensic
examination (investigate every potential lead) where the official
narrative is that “the demolition was effected merely through a
gravity driven collapse.”
No
amount of gravity on Earth will induce temperatures of 1000 degrees
Celsius to persist for months after the event!
It
is not my intent to identify all the anomalies in the official
narrative. My purpose is to provide an insight into the nature of the
controversy in order to introduce the issue of the building known as
World Trade Center 7 or the Salomon Bros building constructed and
completed after the twin towers known as WTC
1 and WTC 2 were completed in 1972 and 1973 respectively.
WTC
7 was completed 1986, was built over an electrical substation,
and employed similar design
features in its structure as the twin
towers; that is a strong core and multiple outer columns to
facilitate a large area of clear space on each floor between the core
and outer columns. Floor trusses and pans were suspended between the
inner and outer columns and concrete slabs were poured over the pans.
47 floors in WTC 7, a large building in most cities, dwarfed by the
twin towers who were 110 floors each and 64 x 64 metres square.
Most
people are familiar with the 9/11
narrative or story
of the two planes American Airlines flight 11 and United Airlines
flight 175 striking WTC 1 and 2 at 8:47am and 9:03am respectively and
the spectacular destruction of WTC2 at 9:59am, 56 minutes after the
initial strike; and WTC1 at 10:29am, 1 hour and 42 minutes after it
was struck by the plane.
The
9/11 event had additional attacks (which this paper doesn't address
in detail);
Against
the US Defense Force headquarters Washington DC where the Pentagon
building's West Wing was struck by a plane
which the 9/11 narrative said was American Airlines flight 77, and;
At
a rural location in Pennsylvania where United Airlines Flight 93 came
to ground.
However
UAL 93 came to ground in many pieces separated by kilometres as
though it was destroyed in mid air and the respective parts coming to
earth across a vast field. The fact of the wide
debris field including across Indian Lake's lake informs the
discerning public that the US Government narrative
on this part of the 9/11 crime was false.
What happens to the official conspiracy narrative where intrinsic elements of the whole story are proved false? Where does the lie stop and truth enter the frame?
It
is important to note at the time of the respective collapses the WTC
towers had survived the initial shock of the plane strikes and the
resultant combustion of the surplus plane fuel.
The
only fires remaining were the result of the combustion of materials
in the WTC offices. Never have office fires caused a steel framed
building to collapse.
The
catalyst for the sudden onset of WTC 1, 2 and 7's collapse remained a
mystery without positing some additional agency.
WTC
7 suffered some fires at or below its 13th
floor. The building survived these for many hours and the fires were
effectively extinguished by the onset of that late afternoon. At
5:20pm WTC 7 was demolished in spectacular fashion. It lost all
structural support in its lower floors and descended to ground
including a 2.5 second portion of its descent at free fall velocity.
Free fall velocity
can only be attained where there's no resistance to falling.
A
building's structure is a lot of resistance in a non magical world.
For WTC7 to descend at free fall it requires that; “all support
columns in the steel structure must fail prior to the onset of
collapse.” which is a peculiar observation for a large building
structure that the official narrative asserts suffered damage by fire
only.
Additionally
the observed collapse or demolition was symmetrical in its effect
whereas the fires would have had an asymmetrical effect on the
building's structure.
The
problem of WTC7 gained serious traction with critically minded
architects and engineers
who sponsored a study to assess the nature and likely cause of the
building's demolition. The result was that Professor Leroy Hulsey and
associates from Alaska Fairbanks University were contracted to
undertake the WTC7 evaluation study. The draft findings of that study
were published Tuesday 3 September 2019:
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Summary of the study findings are twofold;
The
principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the
collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and
private engineering firms that studied the collapse.
The
secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a
global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every
column in the building.
The
full report is a pdf file at this link:
Professor
Hulsey features in a video presenting the WTC7 evaluation findings
Tuesday evening 3 September at Alaska Fairbanks University. The video
is available here:
and
via it's embed code here:
For
those in the academy who wish to provide comment, critique or
otherwise engage with the study the following information is
important;
The
research team is currently organizing and uploading all of its data
into a format that can be readily downloaded and used. We expect to
post the data sometime between September 16 and September 30, 2019.
There
will be a two-month public comment period from September 3 to
November 1, 2019, with the final report will be released later this
year. During this period, we welcome any and all members of the
public to submit constructive comments intended to further the
analyses and presentation of findings contained in the report.
Designated reviewers external to UAF and Architects & Engineers
for 9/11 Truth will also review the report during this period.
Commenters are asked to send their comments in an attached PDF or
Word document to publiccomment@AE911Truth.org
New
Zealand's academic professionals including those who have already
made prior observations about the World Trade Center demolitions
might study and critique the WTC7 evaluation method and findings.
Through contributing you provide your professional perspective before
the draft published study findings become final.
I
have previously engaged with individual NZ academics about this
matter from engineering, international relations, psychology and
journalism/media study faculties. Invariably those who I have engaged
have either uttered no comment, or replicated the narrative promoted
by the US Government or offered only nuanced dissent from that
“official conspiracy narrative.”
World Trade Center building 7 demolition – what are implications of the study findings?
The
secondary conclusion of WTC7 study is that;
“the
collapse of building was a global failure involving the
near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building,” which;
<>
means that an hitherto unknown agency was employed to demolish the
buildings removing all the core columns. One can speculate about what
that was. When one watches video of the WTC7 demolition captured at
the moment of the free-fall collapse and compares that with a
controlled demolition of other similar buildings one could reach no
other conclusion than “the building's demise was as a result of
planned demolition by whatever method.”
<>
means that the perpetrators must have been given a pass by the WTC
security
services. Ordinarily controlled demolition projects take considerable
planning and time to ensure cutting and or demolition charges are
placed at appropriate points in a building's structure to attain a
clean destruction. Note: it is generally the case that demolition
contractors work on vacant buildings and or structures. The WTC
7 building and the remainder of the WTC complex were close to
full occupancy.
<>
means inside job. An inside job is generally a reference to a
conspiracy by insider personnel to commit an act and present it as
the result of some other agency or scapegoat. Where US authority
personnel provide cover for and lie about the 9/11 crime, where
explosives are a necessary component to create the observed event,
then it is clear that US authority personnel were assisting the 9/11
project.
<>
means the terrorist narrative is likely a lie.
<>
means the global war on terror is a lie
also.
<>
means the whole world was hoaxed.
<>
means stay hoaxed and live in a world narrative built on lies or do
something to remove the terrible lie and its false narrative.
Global sustainability, climate action, and open government
The
following is a comment
I placed on a video
of The Right Hon Helen Clark promoting the UN Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) at an event sponsored by Auckland University Aug 28,
2019;
Thanks
Helen and Auckland University for your leadership and work.
A
large question is how can the people of the Earth take the
talking-heads seriously when they do not stop their support for the
largest problem that obstructs us in attaining peace and prosperity -
militarism?
NZ
is part of the US centred military empire, but wants to fix the
planet and create peace and prosperity - how does NZ do both? One
only needs to look at the global war on terror to apprehend the truth
of who is the militaristic force.
Central
to our concerns ought be how to provide for the growing population of
the planet, thought to reach about 11 billion before plateauing
toward the closing stages of the 21st Century.
Every
activity that humans undertakes in an institutional manner involves
industrial activity, which invariably mean increases of greenhouse
gases and the pressures that civilisation places on wilderness
(Amazon Fires presently).
The
problem with militarism and war employed as an economic tool to
attain goals by those who resort to war mongering is that it wastes
valuable resources, people and energy.
Any
efforts to rein in militarism appear to me to be token and evidently
not working as particular Western nations act in a unified manner to
attack chosen enemies when the US imperial power says so...
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Sudan, Yemen and demonise certain
states... North Korea, Iran; as authoritarian whereas there are
plenty of despots supported by Western imperial powers - thus
hypocrisy is evident.
I
placed the following evidence before the NZ Parliament Environment
select committee in respect to their consideration of the "Climate
Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Bill" presenting oral
evidence 26 August 2019:
The
thesis being there's no fix whilst militarism precludes cooperation.
Helen
Clark in the Public Talk opens with a reference to the Millennium
Summit September 2000 - humanity's leaders attempting cooperation for
common good:
However
the more powerful (or disruptive) force for evil was also working. At
the same time Sept 2000, the "Project For a New American
Century" (PNAC) [Many PNAC signatories were given administrative
roles in the George W Bush Presidential administration] published
their prophetic report and plan, "Rebuilding America's Defenses"
which I unpack in the following blog - part of my evidence to the NZ
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade select committee in respect to its
TPP treaty examination:
All
Western nations with few exceptions accepted in a public and
apparently unquestioned manner the US narrative as to what occurred
on 11 September 2001?
However
the people of the world were sold a lie by the leadership which in
turn is causal to the millions killed, injured, traumatised and
displaced through the Global War on Terror (GWoT). GWoT has been
causal for the huge increase in refugees which are now north of 60
million off a base of 30 million at the time of the Millennium
Summit.
Dr.
Leroy Hulsey's WTC7 evaluation study is due for report September 3
2019. It is a forensic engineering assessment into the cause of the
demolition and collapse of WTC7 a 47 storey structure built on the
Northern side of Vesey St opposite the main World Trade Centre
complex, all of which were destroyed in the coordinated attack on US
assets in New York and Washington DC, Tuesday 11 September 2001:
Extracted
preliminary findings;
The
findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building.
Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the
entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously.
No
plane or any other substantial force was revealed to have struck the
WTC 7 building during the attack according to official reports.
Notwithstanding that the demolition of the building where all core
columns collapse simultaneously can only occur where agency is
brought to bear. What was the agency how was it applied, and how did
the agents who administered the demolition agents access WTC 7 to
apply their agency?
The
question of who secured the WTC site to ensure it was protected might
be the inquiry of a reasonable person.
It
turns out that one of the corporations associated was called
Securacom and that then President George W Bush's younger brother
Marvin was a principle.
This
information was not made public in the 9/11 Commission report.
How
would it change the world, if the 9/11 Commission Report narrative is
proven to be officially false?
Would
the fact of the public exposure of the real 9/11 perpetrators set
back the war mongers' agenda and encourage or facilitate peace? I
attempt to answer that herein:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200927013324/https://ourplanet.org/greenplanetfm/greg-rzesniowiecki-what-if-the-911-commission-report-narrative-is-proven-officially-false
What
we know and what we don't know – next steps on the road to truth
and sanity
It
is fair to say that I am a non expert, I am not trained in the
academy, I do not suffer from the need to protect my professional
reputation. I am free to offer my opinion, however, informed and
factual and I have done so in respect to the 9/11 crime. As these are
related I advocate for the need for open
government, and the need to protect whistleblowers and those who
facilitate
whistleblowers brave souls who inform the public of corruption in
our institutions.
This
is why I refer to myself as a public advocate.
You
might disagree with certain asserted statements or representations of
the 9/11 crime made within this paper. I know that I have shifted my
view of the mechanics and scope of the event especially since 2006
when I commenced serious investigation. I have also considered the
motivations of the crime perpetrators.
Who
said “go 9/11” and put that into effect needs to be discovered,
however, the fact that we do not know every fact about the
perpetrators, the demolition agency, or who in the US and other
governments did what to assist or obstruct the 9/11 crime, is no
reason to dispose of the fact that the official 9/11 narrative by US
Authorities is bogus.
That
being the case the world deserves a truthful explanation. Those
killed, maimed and displaced as a result of 9/11 and the bogus
war on terror deserve justice. The world needs the 9/11 lie to be
officially disposed of and institutional mechanisms enshrined to
ensure that never again are we the people hoaxed into killing in
other people's wars.
Recommendations to New Zealand University faculties and academics
1. Consider your values – do you and your institution work toward a sustainable future for NZ and global inhabitants?
A.
Do your institution and your personal actions match your stated
object of securing a sustainable future?
B.
Is it possible to support militarism and be true to your stated
values of working toward a sustainable future.
2. Consider passing the following resolution and forwarding it to the NZ Government recommending it acts to end support for militarism and oppose all forms of aggression;
We
(name of institution) express our concern at the discovery that the
9/11 crime was assisted and covered up by US authorities.
We
further find that the 9/11 crime, despite being assisted from within
the US administration, was used as pretext for the declaration for
the global war on terror by the United States.
We
find that the aggression launched against the nation states of
Afghanistan 2001 and Iraq 2003, using 9/11 as pretext was both
morally and lawfully wrong.
We
request that the NZ Government undertakes a public and transparent
inquiry into all intelligence and correspondence received in respect
to the 9/11 crime and the terrorism wars including against
Afghanistan and Iraq and make that public, including that the inquiry
investigates;
- to the extent possible all aspects of the 9/11 crime.
- the reasons for the war launched against Afghanistan.
- the reasons for the war launched against Iraq.
- NZ ally's (US, UK, France, Israel, Australia, Canada, and willing coalition partners) aggression against Libya, Syria, Yemen, Nth Korea, Venezuela and Russia and makes those findings public.
That
the NZ Government take steps to disassociate the NZ nation state from
military and intelligence sharing alliances with nations that do not
share our values
aimed at “achieving peaceful cooperation between all of the
planet's nations in order to secure an abundant future for all
nations and their inhabitants.”
Ends.
-----000---000-----
Media release sent to a large list of NZ news media organisations about 10:30am Thursday 12 September 2019.
Media
Release – on 9/11 2019 anniversary - will you promote truth or
lies?
For
immediate use
Greg
Rzesniowiecki, public advocate: My
issues of concern; truth, open government, 9/11, climate, militarism,
alliances with those who do not share NZ values.
Open
letter to NZ academics on the occasion of the 18th anniversary of the
9/11 crime
Much
has been said of 9/11, by US Authorities, NZ's Government and the
mainstream media both in NZ and abroad.
9/11
has been employed as pretext to launch the global war on terror.
Most
of the world and 99% of legacy news media reported faithfully the US
Government narrative that the whole story and sole perpetrators of
the 9/11 crime were 19 mostly Saudi Arabian hijackers who
commandeered 4 planes and flew two of them (AA 11, UAL 175) into the
World Trade Center (WTC) towers, one (AA 77) into the west wing of
the Pentagon and the remaining flight (UAL 93) into a field in
Pennsylvania.
Most
of that narrative is false. It is false in respect to many of the
stated facts, more importantly it is a lie by omission, as the
official conspiracy theory doesn't account for the WTC destruction
and many further anomalies.
Citizens
and professionals who act with integrity are uncovering and
disclosing the facts of the 9/11 crime.
US
Authorities undertook no serious forensic examination of the overall
crime, nor was the World Trade Center destruction true cause
faithfully investigated. Citizens and vigilant professionals are
investigating and providing their scientific findings.
Never
in the history of modern civil engineering have massive steel framed
buildings been destroyed by fire.
Nevertheless
after most of the initial fires were extinguished and the force of
the plane strike absorbed and accommodated by the twin towers the
building's rendered to dust and chopped up steel in dramatic fashion
56 minutes (WTC2) and 1 hour 42 minutes (WTC1) later. WTC7 was part
of the World Trade Center complex demolished in spectacular fashion
at 5:20pm 11 September 2001 hours after the demolition of the
remainder of the WTC complex, the Pentagon attack and the Flight 93
plane smash at Pennsylania.
An
open minded observer might reasonably compare the WTC collapses with
controlled demolition of other redundant structures.
How
to unpack the truth of the 9/11 matter is a concern – does the NZ
news media share the desire to report truth?
I
have written and forwarded an open letter/essay to NZ academics on
the occasion of the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 crime. It reports
the timely news of the draft findings from Professor Leroy Hulsey and
associates' Alaska Fairbanks University WTC7 evaluation study,
published Tuesday 3 September 2019.
The
WTC7 evaluation draft findings
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Summary of the study findings are twofold;
The
principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the
collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and
private engineering firms that studied the collapse.
The
secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a
global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every
column in the building.
The
self evident implication is that an hitherto unknown agency was
employed to demolish the buildings removing all the core columns. One
can speculate about what that was. When one watches video of the WTC7
demolition captured at the moment of the free-fall collapse and
compares that with a controlled demolition of other similar buildings
one could reach no other conclusion than “the building's demise was
as a result of planned demolition by whatever method.”
Demolition
charges used at WTC 7 undermine the US Government narrative in
respect the 9/11 attack. That in turn creates doubt in respect to the
pretext for the war on terror, its merit and its justification under
rule of law.
I
urge academics, journalists and professionals who care for truth and
integrity, to take the time to consider the contents of the paper and
act to ensure the world is move toward a just and sustainable
tomorrow.
The
paper asks how NZ can support militarism and seek cooperation for
climate action as these appear to be opposed or contrary objectives.
Attached:
NZ Academy - 9/11, Militarism, Climate - will you promote truth or
lies?
Paper
to NZ academics also available as a blog:
Ends.
Seriously, get challenged on actual data over the COVID 19 disease, and you go off into an echo chamber.
ReplyDeleteI thought better of you than that, Greg.
Hi ask me anything; how is the Covid thingee going for you?
DeleteHow many boosters and how many times have you and your associates and fellow mRNA enthusiasts? A couple of times had Covid and tested positive? Are you still wearing a mask?
What a grift is the Covid boondoggle mate, what do reckon?