Monday, 19 June 2023

How to Fix the Bill of Rights to stop medical mandates

With the growth industry of freedom parties and the recent meltdown in the Democracy NZ Party, I thought it timely to remind folk of a potential solution to the problem of Section 5 Justified Limits of the Bill of Rights 1990 (BORA) to effectively (and safely) stop any future medical mandates. 

The importance of doing this is further necessary as New Zealand's Government and the other 193 nation states party to the World Health Organisation (WHO) are negotiating toward endorsing a Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR). Much has been said about what is in the drafts and the intent of these instruments. One thing is for sure, the desire of WHO and the various governments including NZ is to double down on the COVID-19 Pandemic Response. 

As such we must act to inoculate NZ and our population from mass global overreach and mendacious stupidity. 

With that as the ground we are working with, I dust off my proposal to fix the Bill of Rights. I'll do a further post on the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 in the near term, as I have taken an active interest in these from 2021. 

Here's how to fix the Bill of Rights so it protects the life and security of the person. 

Petition of Greg Rzesniowiecki: Amend Section 5 and add a new section 5A to the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 published November 2021 and sponsored to the House in December 2021 by ACT Party leader David Seymour. 


Here's a link to the evidence I tendered and screen capture of the papers, which includes the advice from the Ministry of Justice to the Petitions Committee. note the Ministry of Health did not offer any advice to counter my evidence in respect to the COVID-19 phenomena or the Government's Response: 

https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/submissions-and-advice/all?custom=PET_117877

A number of Freedom parties have made claims about entrenching BORA and or making it supreme law. 

There is a problem with entrenchment of the Law or getting rid of Section 5 in the sense that, "which rights are entrenched?" Section 5 is about justified limitations. Recall we all support, "do no harm." 

If there were no justified limitations on freedoms you’d get some absurd and dangerous results: for example, “freedom of movement” would mean that we couldn’t jail murderers, “freedom of expression” would mean that there could be no offence of possessing child pornography. So we need to comprehend justified limits! 

The solution needs to be nuanced and effective. 

The solution I proposed was simply to make supreme law or entrench those sections that protect the life and security of the person sections 8, 9, 10 and 11, which would stop any future mandates if we gained a majority in the House to make it so! 

Matt King has known about this since it was promoted in 2021, so has Bishop Tamaki and Sue Grey and more. I'm not sure about Leighton Baker, (but he follows me on facebook so must have a clue). 

These all know the problem of entrenchment versus fixing section 5 "Justified Limits." I promoted the Petition to the House in 2021. 

My Petition read; That the House of Representatives amend Section 5 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 by inserting “and subject to section 5A”, and insert a new section 5A: “Unjustified limitations” to say “None of sections 4, 5, 6 provide any justified limits on rights and freedoms contained in sections 8, 9, 10 and 11” 

Read the Bill of Rights here particularly sections 8, 9, 10 and 11:


I provided two initial documents to the Petitions Committee and a request to present oral evidence in person. They didn't want to let me near them in person. 

The Petitions Committee invited advice from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). 

MoJ provided advice to the Petitions Committee in respect to my petition to fix S 5 of BORA in July 2021: 


Which said in part; Most of the rights cited in the petition either cannot be justifiably limited, or would be very difficult to justifiably limit, as described in the next section. 

 MoJ said in respect to s 11 (the right to refuse medication); Section 11 protects the ability of individuals to decline to have medical treatment, safeguarding individual autonomy and dignity. There are a number of circumstances in which section 11 can be justifiably limited; for example, medical treatment of children, cases where a power of attorney is activated, or where persons need emergency medical treatment and are unconscious. Rule 7(4) of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights permits treatment without consent in circumstances such as these. 

The Ministry of Justice advice did nothing to negate my proposed amendment to BORA, and in respect to the critique they did offer I propose a solution, see below. 

In August 2021 I provided the Petitions Committee with a response to the MoJ paper and adjustment to s 11 to accommodate their specific concerns. From page 7 of my paper. 


Without prejudice, MoJ's advice provides for limited derogations and only for specific circumstances where a person, not a class of persons, might be unable to provide their consent freely; eg: children and persons unable to make decisions for themselves. 

If the examples provided in the MoJ advice are the sum total of the NZ Government and Parliament's concern in relation to the absolutism of the proposed BORA amendment, I imagine a suitable qualifying addendum might be added to section 11 similar to the caveat in Sec 8; that is, the right not to be deprived of life except in accordance with fundamental justice. 

Without prejudice, section 11 might state; Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment; the caveat being; informed consent might be provided for children by their guardians, and for persons unable to make decisions for themselves by lawfully enacted means. This elaborates the individual and specific nature of any derogation. The petitioner looks favourably upon any similar textual solution. Ends.

All this requires reading and study, the links are here. 

If we want to fix BORA this is a potential effective solution. 

Then ask why the freedom parties cannot comprehend the fix? 

When I proposed this solution in the petition I concentrated on Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11. It may be that we could also fix other aspects of BORA in similar fashion to stop any discrimination based on digital IDs or health passports. 

However, if we fix BORA to protect the life and security of the person, the rest of the NWO impositions would probably fail as they undermine the working of this proposed fix. 

The key message herein is this proposed amendment to BORA would effectively entrench freedom from medical mandate. 

I hope this assists the conversation about how to ensure no more health mandates.

Monday, 2 May 2022

COVID-19 Evidence To NZ Regional Councils and Territorial Authorities Annual Plan consultations – April 2022

This post is a replication of my paper in regard to COVID-19 evidence and facts for local government. I emailed it on 12 April to all 78 Regional Councils and Territorial Authorities on the occasion of their annual plan consultation process with their constituents. 

I've placed 6 recommendations before them in paragraphs 72, 82, and 91 of the paper as well as append my paper to the NZ Parliament Petitions Committee in respect to the petition in my name to amend section 5 of the Bill of Rights Act 1990 (BORA). 

Recommendation 1:  Council studies the evidence contained in the paper to the Petitions Committee and this paper and consider recommending to local Parliamentary Representatives and the NZ Parliament that they accept the petition and enact the suggested amendment adding a new Section 5A to NZ BORA. 

Recommendation 2:  Council supports the initiation of an adequately resourced, public, transparent, jurisdictionally competent commission of inquiry into the COVID-19 pandemic and the NZ Government COVID-19 Response be undertaken with terms of reference that ensures there are no limits to its power to gain disclosure, including to the NZ - Pfizer contracts for supply of Comirnaty. 

Recommendation 3:  Council oppose NZ's participation in any WHO pandemic treaty which causes NZ's Government to act arbitrarily, undemocratically, unscientifically, unethically or derogate from common rights including the rights and freedoms provided in NZ's Bill of Rights Act 1990.

Recommendation 4:  Council conveys its support for the propositions to the NZ Parliamentarians paying particular attention to the MPs who service your city, district or region.

Recommendation 5:  Any Council continuing COVID-19 Measures ought cease forthwith.

Recommendation 6:  Council considers promoting these materials to its constituency so as to ensure more New Zealanders are informed in respect to the facts and science of the Covid phenomena.


I had been working on it and the petition to amend Section 5 of BORA for a while and felt the need to forward this to Councils before the window for public input closes. 

I've kept it focused on the Covid matter and vaccine mandates, preferring not to expand it to three waters and more issues that Councils are already facing. 

One hopes that freedom lovers in the various council districts, cities and regions pick the recommendations up and lobby their councils to support these reasonable suggestions.


-----
  

Open Letter To all Regional Councils and Territorial Authorities on the occasion of your Annual Plan consultation – April 2022

Dear Chair, Mayor, Councillor, CEOs and Officers in council administrations,

Subject: Truth, Freedom, Rights and Responsibilities in the age of COVID-19


I write on behalf of those who might agree with the following statement;

We have experienced something despicable with the COVID-19 Response Measures and Vaccine Mandates”


1. Please consider this paper and associated recommendations in your 2022 Annual and or Long Term Planning process.

2. By way of introduction, I, Greg Rzesniowiecki have previously written to all regional councils and territorial authorities in 2014 and 2018 in relation to your Council's Annual and Long Term Plans identifying overarching problems and suggesting policy solutions.


Introduction

3. This formal correspondence brings matters to your Council's attention to enable proper consideration of the impact of high level criminality and its detrimental effect on the people and economy of New Zealand.

4. Covid phenomena has dominated NZ and global life and policy settings for two years. What is it really about?

5. The likely vector of emergence for the mysterious SARS-CoV-2 virus is that it's a product of the global bioweapons1 programs and likely was deliberately released given the lockstep response managed internationally. The evidence for this case is circumstantial though well considered and offers a plausible hypothesis, whereas zoonotic emergence of the bug is well discarded with available knowledge. The pangolin association is a myth and part of the official disinformation to protect Dr Fauci and friends who provided significant funding to Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

6. It is important that Council on behalf of their people have a full picture of the Covid matter. To operate under false assumptions or in absence of a factual view of the data about Covid and the COVID-19 Response is potentially a fatal or life threatening decision.

7. Factual material and information within this paper proves beyond all reasonable doubt that Pfizer's COVID-19 Comirnaty gene therapy product is neither safe nor effective.

8. Criminal action is perpetrated as a result of the NZ Government's COVID-19 Response enactments, lockdowns and policy, acquiescence to, or promoting a particular ideological agenda, similar to other nation's policies (often Western jurisdictions) in respect to COVID-19 which might be paraphrased; “COVID-19 elimination and lockdown directives will drive more New Zealanders to be vaccinated.” This despite the novel nature of the gene therapy mRNA product and its unknown safety profile. All care and no responsibility gone mad.

9. Who directed the NZ Government to follow the “get vaccinated or perish” policy, as opposed to, treat the ill and leave the well and healthy to get on with their lives?2

10. What is in the vaccines that it is so important to vaccinate every New Zealander down to a very young age?

11. If it was so good people would queue for it, not be whipped into taking the toxic sorcerer's brew.3


    Evil flourishes where good men do nothing – Edmund Burke

    It is easier to fool a man than to convince him he has been fooled – Mark Twain


On fooling the people with industrial precision


A. Brainwashing with Professor Joel Dimsdale

12. Professor Joel Dimsdale discusses his latest book “Dark Persuasion: A History of Brainwashing from Pavlov to Social Media” in the linked video, which traces the evolution of brainwashing from its beginnings in torture and religious conversion into the age of neuroscience and social media. Dimsdale is distinguished professor emeritus in the Department of Psychiatry at UC San Diego.


Screen capture about 6 mins into the video on what brainwashing involves



B. Mass formation with Professor Mattias Desmet

13. “Mattias Desmet on Our Grave Situation” youtube video published 3 December 2021. Mattias Desmet, Professor of Clinical Psychology, Ghent University in Belgium,4 talks with Peak Prosperity's Chris Martenson about his work that connects past historical episodes of what is called “Mass Formation” (for example Nazi Germany and periods of communist control under Lenin and Stalin in USSR) and current events. Desmet's thesis suggests that unless a few brave and courageous people are willing to stand up and say “I don’t agree!” history suggests that we will end up with a fully totalitarian outcome. Who is for that?

14. New Zealand's Councils might provide part of the necessary and courageous solution.


Vaccine harm is enormous and growing with every jab

15. Unfortunately it is plain the NZ Government knew of the looming vaccination carnage; that is the harm, injury and death that would flow from vaccinating New Zealanders through the Government's access to Pfizer's data made available through the requirements of Comirnaty's Provisional Approval 3 February 2021 in its Vaccinate NZ project.

16. The NZ Government knew that significant numbers of New Zealanders would be killed and injured for the sole reason of accepting injection with the Pfizer mRNA lipid serum product.

17. The conspiracy is breathtakingly large where one acknowledges similar policies being enacted with similar contracts for mRNA vaccines in other people's nations to experiment on them.

18. When insufficient took up the mRNA injectable, the NZ Government mandated employees in chosen sectors of the economy both public and private to be jabbed or face economic ruin through termination of employment, plus driving businesses, employers and Councils to mandate their staff and limit public access to buildings and assets.

19. Post vaccination adverse reactions in NZ have already killed over 400 (confirmed on citizens database) and the number potentially killed is double that in suspected cases requiring further investigation - work is being done to clarify the circumstances of these deaths post jab.

20. Excess mortality in 2021 was 2000 deaths. The only change between 2020 and 2021 was 80% of New Zealand's adult population being vaccinated with Pfizer's mRNA gene therapy product.

21. It is reasonable to posit the post vaccination cull at over 1000 people and possibly more of the 2021 excess mortality (what other cause is there – there was no influenza in 2021 and NZ stats assure us that suicides were running at the typical ~600 per annum). If it is unreasonable to entertain such a hypothesis from this data, then it is important to at least investigate the Vaccine's toxic effects to determine the cause of an unusually high number of deaths in 2021.

22. Medsafe safety data on Pfizer's Comirnaty product declares that up to 28 February 2022 a total of 10,621,074 doses of Comirnaty have been administered and 58,135 AEFIs (adverse events following injection) were reported. In the same period a total of 156 deaths were reported to CARM after the administration of the Comirnaty vaccine.

23. Reporting of adverse events leading to injury or death is not mandatory, which means CARM is not an accurate signal of the harm, but its alarm light ought be glowing red with the injuries registered to date.

24. Since 17 January 2022 NZ's Government offered COVID-19 vaccination to 476,000 children between ages 5-11. Consent for children is legally determined by the guardian. That is perverse given children do not suffer much from Covid-19 symptoms, however, they will bear considerable risk of long term injury or death from Covid-19 vaccination.


Case to NZ Police

25. I wrote to the NZ Police through the agency of a specific detective officer in October 2021 offering a report; “Case to NZ Police” (attached as Appendix B). It outlined the Covid vaccine carnage; death, injury and destruction perpetrated to then ~270 deaths and 1000 serious injuries temporally associated with Vaccination. The report identified evidence of breaches of the Crimes Act including culpable homicide in the case of those killed.

26. The answer from the police officer was that operations management would not be pursuing any investigation into the COVID-19 Vaccination matter and further suggested that the charge wasn't culpable homicide and a charge of genocide was more likely appropriate. Further it was suggested that if one wished to pursue the matter it ought be referred to an international tribunal or court – which means the ICC International Criminal Court.5

27. Given the potential routes to a just solution are most likely in our own hands – it is critical that we the people of New Zealand look to our own laws, constitution and our own people power for that just solution. (See recommendations paragraphs 72, 82 and 91)


Nano structures in the Vaccines

28. Nano structures appear or grow in the Pfizer mRNA lipid emulsion product extracted directly from vials of Comirnaty – there are at least two known ingredients that are secret, however, there may be extra elements, and any synergies or processes resulting from interaction with a Vaccination host or more stimuli; electro magnetic radiation, heat; that are withheld from public knowledge or yet to emerge.

29. No one that I know of gave consent to be vaccinated with graphene oxide or similar substances seen in the mRNA vaccine vials. Graphene oxide is not regulated for human use as a medical intervention. Where these substances and structures were a known outcome of the Pfizer mRNA product and their inclusion in the Vaccine isn't disclosed to vaccine recipients, then it is prima facie a crime.6

30. No one from authority is forthcoming with any explanation in respect to the nano-scale structures despite repeated reports to NZ Ministry of Health officials, Government Ministers and NZ Police. There appears to be a conspiracy to deny and/or downplay any and all reports of deleterious elements or adverse effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccination products.

31. Already many hundreds if not thousands of New Zealanders have expired as a result of the COVID-19 Vaccination, and tens of thousands have suffered harm, injury, some might be long lasting or terminal conditions brought on by myocarditis, extreme clotting - thrombosis or strokes. Get a stroke or myocarditis as a result of a vaccination against a flu like illness? As of January 2022, the reported incidence of local and systemic side effects from mRNA was 27% in the general public – in NZ that would be about 1 million people suffering some side effect.

32. Toxins accumulate toxic effects - the more shots the more potential/real long term detrimental effects. Oncologists are noticing the onset of previously dormant cancers. The Pfizer product distorts the immune system, including components that fight off cancer, to lower the resistance a vaccinated individual's body would ordinarily use to counter foreign intrusion or toxins. This may be a design element to allow the mRNA lipid minimal resistance in its path and effect in a recipient's body. Potentially permanent switches to miss a flu like illness.

33. Long term immune system decline is forecast. There is the need to study vaccination recipients for more problematic symptoms and conditions yet to manifest that might not appear in similar numbers in the unvaccinated proportion of the New Zealand and global population.

34. We Covid sceptics7 are learning more as we study the Covid phenomena and the ground of its emergence. Some of this publicly available information is dismissed as misinformation and or disinformation. It is noteworthy that the ones hurling the misinformation slurs prefer not to discuss or debate the content and merits of that which they denigrate. The phenomena arises from the same mentality that use the pejorative 'conspiracy theory' slur to deny facts without discussing the matter.8

35. From Pfizer's documentation discovered through US FOIA action against the FDA we now know that the Pfizer product has literally thousands of adverse potential reactions as these are already observed in recipients or projected to arise.

36. From what is known about the mRNA products begs the question; “how anyone can give proper informed consent to the Comirnaty injectable product and boosters,” as clearly none were properly informed of the harmful and fatal potentials arising from the full dynamics of all the ingredients and their interface with individual human cell tissues in vital organs like brains, hearts and gonads in those who are Vaccinated.


Variation in Pfizer mRNA vaccine batches

37. The lethality of batches or lots of Pfizer and Moderna (and others) COVID-19 vaccination products varied, indicating malfeasance, or where unintended then criminal negligence. NZ does not check the contents of the vials other than maintain and audit their chain of custody and the associated documentation.


Pfizer Comirnaty is not safe - nor is it effective

38. All scientific evidence shows that whether a person has taken one, two, three or zero mRNA shots makes no difference to whether they can catch SARSCoV2 nor whether they can infect others with it. Recent Lancet articles prove this conclusively. Additionally data from the current epidemic in NZ point to the lack of efficacy of being vaccinated. Add to its ineffectiveness, the carnage and harm its deployment has caused, for a perspective about the lengths NZ's Government has gone to promote an unsafe novel product.

39. Manufacturers of the mRNA injection have never claimed that it stops infection or transmission of SARS-CoV-2. In fact, it was never designed to do it, or tested for it.

40. The number of people needed to vaccinate (NNTV) to prevent one infection is extremely large and astronomical to prevent one COVID-19 death.

41. COVID-19 morbidity is about that of a serious influenza season and is treatable using relatively cheap generic drugs. Early treatment of any serious symptoms of COVID-19 infection using all available remedies and therapeutics is superior to the NZ Government determination to vaccinate everyone.

42. Natural immunity is superior to any COVID-19 vaccine induced immunity.

43. People who accept the COVID-19 vaccine are as likely to become infected with the disease and transmit it. Vaccination drives variant selection to evade vaccines.

44. So far and according to the NZ Government's statistics with COVID-19 daily infections of thousands per day since late February, MoH data as of 6 April (link is archive of 5-4-2022 data) has a total of 741987 people have become infected including 82,682 active cases and 426 (or 456 - count with broader parameters) died with COVID-19 (and often more confounding medical conditions).


COVID-19 is no more deadly than influenza

45. About 400 to 450 people die as a result of respiratory infections and associated distress upon their preexisting conditions in influenza seasons and these generally fall in that winter and associated flu/cold season, an annual cull of the vulnerable and susceptible observed in statistics and from a study of human excess mortality. More die during a serious influenza season such as 2019. Each year 600 die by suicide.

46. NZ spent tens of billions running from the Covid pandemic, delayed for two years to Vaccinate the willing, coerced and those forced or blackmailed (loss of job) to take the clotshot, with a product that doesn't protect against infection.

47. Has NZ's COVID-19 Response aided in reducing mental health problems, or, has it exacerbated mental health and anxiety problems in the population – these are some of New Zealand's most vulnerable people. Pushing the precariat into destitution through Covid economic vandalism for two years is not economically nor morally smart.

48. The leading causes of death in 2019 were cancer, ischaemic heart diseases and cerebrovascular diseases (with 110.5, 47.0 and 21.5 deaths per 100,000 population respectively).

49. Applying the same statistical proportions to those who “died from or with Covid-19” in NZ since the pandemic's commencement in 2020, would reveal that less than ten (10) per 100,000 of the population died from/with Covid-19 to date. A death rate of 10 per 100,000 would translate to a few more than 500 deaths for New Zealand's population of 5 million. NZ's 2022 Omicron epidemic might close at 600 deaths (similar to influenza season) before NZ moves to the winter influenza season. That will be one to watch.

50. Suicide statistics are over 12 per 100,000! Cure that also – in curing suicide we would necessarily ease a lot of pain and create a more egalitarian social system, where economics and commerce would align with real human needs. See my recommendations to your 2018 Annual Plan process.


COVID-19 Response measures are social and economic vandalism

51. Many people who were in sound social and economic positions have had their livelihood stripped or severely throttled. Recall the increase in dairy farmer suicides as they had their price of milk product recession mid last decade. I imagine a similar cull is underway in light of vandalism done to the general economy from official COVID-19 Measures particularly Auckland mixed business, retail, hospitality with thousands closing.

52. NZ was once noted for its friendliness and warm welcome, whereas, the COVID-19 Response has divided the nation from the world, divided the nation, divided people in its streets and families – great job if one's object is to tear society apart with fear


The basis for policy ought be evidence and data not hearsay and ideology

53. Why did some Councils adopt discriminatory policies against constituents on the unscientific basis presented by the government’s Traffic Light system for supposed control of a inconsequential disease in NZ?

54. With the so-called Omicron epidemic the NZ Government is lowering restrictions despite record case numbers. What possible logic was there in restricting New Zealanders when there was no COVID-19 in the community, except to coerce them to be vaccinated?

55. Did the many NZ councils and territorial authorities that applied or continue to apply a medical apartheid system upon their constituents through arbitrary action, such as; “no jab no access” consider their human rights obligations in law?

56. Medical apartheid was imposed without recourse to any democratic process, or consideration of basic human rights as outlined in the NZ Bill of Rights 1990 (BORA) or the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR) to which NZ has acceded.

57. The CCPR articles 4 and 7 need to be comprehended in the current Covid-19 matter;

Article 4 part 2. No derogation from articles 6, 7, 8 (paragraphs I and 2), 11, 15, 16 and 18 may be made under this provision.

Article 6 part 1. Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

Article 7 No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.

58. We offer facts based on evidence and data. Why did normally intelligent people and councillors or council administrations take draconian measures to deny citizens the right to access council facilities to which they are entitled - many being ratepayers?

59. Are those vaccinated and harmed as a result of the mandated medical intervention to seek redress from Council and or other mandating authorities, businesses and employers? Where an authority injures a person as a condition of work, surely they are liable for the harm caused? Where it is death is it a culpable homicide – manslaughter.

60. Councils breach their fiduciary contract with ratepayers where they deny individuals access, particularly on such spurious grounds.


Greg Rzesniowiecki and previous forays into long term plans

61. Greg has previously written to all regional councils and territorial authorities in 2014 and 2018 in relation to Councils Annual and Long Term Plans;


2014

62. In 2014, I wrote on behalf of the Renewables, a Motueka based Climate Action group, who held an active interest in New Zealand's ability to mitigate Climate Change. The Renewables 2014 correspondence focussed on the TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership) Free Trade Agreement negotiations.

63. As a result of our efforts people in a variety of NZ Councils' constituencies mobilised and lobbied their councils to adopt the TPP Policy Solution, twelve (12) councils from the smallest in South Wairarapa to the largest Auckland who initiated the policy.

64. With the lack of transparency and secrecy in respect to the contract for the supply of the Pfizer gene therapy injectable product it is difficult to determine whether the Pfizer COVID-19 Comirnaty product is supplied by Pfizer NZ, or a foreign Pfizer corporation – to ascertain whether the contract is subject to the CPTPP framework treaty and legislation.

65. Nevertheless, we know from other contracts with Albania and more nations that contract disputes shall be governed by the Laws of the State of New York, USA and attempted assignment of rights or delegation or subcontracting of duties without the required prior written consent of the other Parties shall be void and ineffective.


2018

66. In 2018 I wrote Councils with some proposals about governance and wise policy setting to ensure certain adverse areas of politics and hegemony under imperial decree or direction were to be avoided or countered through use of the “rule of law” as an instrument to establish just outcomes. Alas those proposed policies did not see any serious light of day, though their general adoption might have led to better outcomes in the recent period.


Where available elegant policy solutions to problems are not adopted that non adoption might be unjust and against the “common rights” of individuals and their societies.


Observations, Conclusions and Recommendations


Amend Sec 5 of the NZ Bill of Rights to make the “Life and security of the person” sacred!

67. I am increasingly of the opinion that the only authority that can counter corruption is enforceable rule of law at a local, national and international level. However, the institutions are themselves corrupt.

68. The highest law making body in the land is the NZ Parliament comprising the 120 Representatives and the Commander in Chief, NZ's Governor General. Might they listen?

69. I have an active petition before the NZ Parliament's Petitions Committee seeking an amendment to protect and make sacred our rights and freedoms in sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights 1990 (BORA) under the heading “Life and security of the person.”

70. The petition was sponsored by ACT leader David Seymour and read in the House 14 December 2021.

71. I provided the Petitions Committee with a substantial paper Evidence paper and report on proposal to amend NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 to Petitions Select Committee 1 February 2022 setting out my comprehension of the law and the evidence in respect to the COVID-19 pandemic and the science which demonstrates the unlawful nature of the NZ Government's official response. (A pdf copy of the paper is attached at Appendix A)

72. I strongly recommend that Council makes some resources available to study the Sec 5A petition paper and its implications for NZ and its citizens. Many of the statements I make in this paper to Councils rest on evidence discussed in that more complete expose.


Recommendation 1: Council studies the evidence contained in the paper to the Petitions Committee and this paper and consider recommending to local Parliamentary Representatives and the NZ Parliament that they accept the petition and enact the suggested amendment adding a new Section 5A to NZ BORA.


A public inquiry into the COVID-19 matter is imperative

73. Earlier in this paper I reference science which studied the Pfizer mRNA product extracted directly from a Comirnaty vial under microscopy. The observed nanoscale structures form after exposure to a trigger such as heating, radio frequency radiation or an interaction with the microscope slide surface or other substance. The structures form as the lipids presumably holding the mRNA come out of suspension in the serum in response to heating or stimulation (body heat from being injected into a warm living body).

74. The nanoscale structures grow in geometric forms with apparent right angle connections and continue to grow where conditions allow it. Informed speculation is that the main composition of the structures is the controversial compound molecule graphene oxide. Where Pfizer and others include graphene oxide in their products for vaccination of our people and fail to inform the recipients of the intervention a crime is committed. The people of NZ and the planet need to determine who is ultimately liable. In NZ the question is whether Pfizer or the NZ Government or both in collusion are liable for the crime, so conspiracy to injure and kill.

75. The scale of the undertaking by the perpetrators is extreme with billions of people injected repeatedly with the sorcerer's brew.

76. How did it come to this? We better find out properly with a transparent inquiry.

77. It is imperative that an adequately resourced, public, transparent, jurisdictionally competent commission of inquiry into the COVID-19 pandemic and official response is undertaken with terms of reference that ensures there are no limits to its power to gain disclosure, including to the NZ - Pfizer contracts for supply of Comirnaty.

78. A Royal Commission might be appropriate provided the terms of reference are broad enough to allow a full investigation including facilitating public disclosure of all actions of NZ's Government, Ministries, public servants, mainstream media, selected academics, local and foreign corporations and any other parties who had a bearing on the direction of the COVID-19 pandemic, its origins and any undisclosed agendas at work favouring one course of action over others.

79. Any COVID-19 public inquiry must fully assess the adequacy of the safety processes for the release of novel or new medicines and consider the pharmacovigilance measures employed to capture any concerning safety signals in respect to the Pfizer and other COVID-19 vaccinations and any new therapeutics advanced as COVID-19 cures.

80. The COVID-19 public inquiry must undertake its own independent analysis of the Pfizer and more COVID-19 injectable products to determine the full contents of a range of vials from diverse batch lots. The diverse selection is required because of the already well known variance in the lethality of COVID-19 mRNA injectables including Pfizer's product amongst the varied lot and batches of vials.

81. The COVID-19 public inquiry must address how and why effective cheap generic antiviral remedies and therapies were banned and denied to symptomatic COVID-19 patients.

82. The COVID-19 public inquiry must address why the existing institutions; NZ Police, NZ Judiciary, NZ professional and academic bodies including statutory bodies such as NZ Medical Council and NZ Nurses Council were unable to resist being fooled or were willing accomplices in the Covid vaccinate the planet with mRNA product conspiracy.


Recommendation 2: Council supports the initiation of an adequately resourced, public, transparent, jurisdictionally competent commission of inquiry into the COVID-19 pandemic and the NZ Government COVID-19 Response be undertaken with terms of reference that ensures there are no limits to its power to gain disclosure, including to the NZ - Pfizer contracts for supply of Comirnaty.


WHO to get more power to declare pandemics under a new global pandemic treaty – what could go wrong?

83. New Zealand along with many other nations sponsored a resolution to the World Health Assembly (WHA) calling for the negotiation of a new pandemic treaty. The draft resolution went to the WHA November 2021 meeting where it passed.

84. New Zealand is already a party to the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 adopting them from 2007.

85. There has been much criticism of the WHO role and lead in the COVID-19 pandemic. A proper inquiry is needed to apprehend what has gone right amongst all the things that have gone wrong or were wrongly advised to nation parties to the WHO organisation. It is problematic to develop a new global pandemic treaty absent any comprehension about need, intent or agendas driving the new proposal, nor without knowing what went well and wrong and why with WHO's global COVID-19 Response including directions or advice to NZ Government.

86. If the NZ COVID-19 Response outcome is any guide, NZ and more nations might be better off not party to any treaty that binds NZ to particular actions without any democratic input from NZ's citizens and a proper and transparent discussion of the costs and benefits of any action. Censuring dissent is the path of would be dictators or dictarorial regimes whether totalitarian or populist.

87. Was it the NZ Government's intent in March 2020 to lockdown NZ and maintain an elimination strategy until a COVID-19 vaccine was available, without knowing either the efficacy or safety profile of the resultant vaccine? Or was the vaccine component of the NZ Government response developed afterward?

88. Given we know the vaccine is neither safe nor effective, (a thousand dead from adverse reactions and Omicron ripping through the vaccinated population) how does one score the NZ Government response? Is two years of fear driven elimination a good policy option? Delaying COVID-19 infection has served no useful purpose and at huge cost.

89. Is WHO a trustworthy organisation? Unless we study the Covid phenomena and WHO's role we cannot determine an answer and ought not place blind faith in its directions.

90. Will a WHO Pandemic Treaty provide more ability for the NZ democracy to work out a policy response to a future pandemic or will the treaty likely deliver an arbitrary, politicised, profit driven, mRNA vaccine centric, and potentially ill-fated outcome similar to the global COVID-19 Response.

91. Will a future WHO Pandemic Treaty also ban the use of other therapeutics and generic off label medicines with proven efficacy in dealing with and alleviating respiratory and viral infections? WHO compromised trials in regard to the efficacy of ivermectin during the pandemic. Why on earth would NZ agree to such chicanery other than to maximise big pharma profits?


Recommendation 3: Council oppose NZ's participation in any WHO pandemic treaty which causes NZ's Government to act arbitrarily, undemocratically, unscientifically, unethically or derogate from common rights including the rights and freedoms provided in NZ's Bill of Rights Act 1990.


Recommendation 4: Council conveys its support for the propositions to the NZ Parliamentarians paying particular attention to the MPs who service your city, district or region.


Recommendation 5: Any Council continuing COVID-19 Measures ought cease forthwith.


Recommendation 6: Council considers promoting these materials to its constituency so as to ensure more New Zealanders are informed in respect to the facts and science of the Covid phenomena.

Ends..



Appendix A 

Evidence paper and report on proposal to amend NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 to Petitions Committee, February 2022 

(available for download at this NZDSOS link;  

https://nzdsos.com/2022/02/08/petition-to-parliament-to-amend-the-bill-of-rights-act/ or dropbox linked pdf:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kagv3gqgt4yajvp/Evidence%20paper%20Petition%20SC%20section%205A%20NZ%20BORA%201990_Final_4-2-22.pdf?dl=0 )


Appendix B 

Case to NZ Police October 2021 

(available for download at this dropbox linked pdf:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0ma37xwzu5vqa9x/Case%20to%20NZ%20Police%20%28final%29.pdf?dl=0 )



Footnotes from the paper

1  The link is to a video Covid Crimes – A Witness: Dr Richard Fleming; https://galleries.vidflow.co/awitness Dr Fleming provides context in this 54 minute video for the remainder of the content in this paper as well as explicitly identifying the evidence that the bug SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon and later in the interview that the mRNA vaccines are also products of bioweapons programs. Without coronavirus gain of function research done illegitimately the world would have escaped the Covid phenomena.

2  Parody - “I Bought Myself A Politician” - Mona Lisa Twins published August 2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QAKz_cxTlQ Serious take - long form journalism in the Columbia Journalism Review; “Journalism's Gatekeepers” 21 August 2020, by Tim Schwab about everyone's favourite computer programmer, turned philanthropist, turned vaccinologist – Bill Gates: https://www.cjr.org/criticism/gates-foundation-journalism-funding.php

3  US VAERS data in excess of 25,000 deaths temporally associated with the COVID-19 vaccinations as at 1 April 2022; https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality are similarly reflected in UK and European pharmacovigilance web based data platforms. Additionally NZ Medsafe CARM data as of 28 February 2022 has 156 reports of death and over 58,000 reports of adverse events many unresolved or likely terminal as a result of severe disability associated with myocarditis and more medical conditions; https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/safety-report-41.asp. Of note, it is well established in scientific literature that adverse events, injuries and death are under reported to pharmacovigilance systems.

4  Prof Mattias Desmet profile at Gent University Belgium: https://biblio.ugent.be/person/801001743835. Desmet has been interviewed by numerous people over the past year, as a web search would reveal: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mattias+Desmet+Mass+Formation%22

5  Whereas expert opinion informs that international rule of law is corrupted by the hubris of the powerful nations who use aggression with impunity knowing that they are unlikely to be prosecuted by the ICC or any other tribunal: https://dezayasalfred.wordpress.com/2022/04/07/counterpunch-no-right-arises-from-a-wrong/

6  The implications of, and consequences from nano-structures in people's blood is horrific, nay evil, where it is intended by the manufacturers and those in the COVID-19 conspiracy loop, to inject the unknowing and trusting or credulous public with more than just mRNA and its lipid carrier.

7  Only Covid sceptics in the sense of scepticism about the received wisdom and official COVID-19 narrative promoted by NZ Government and authorities and more at a global level including the WHO and UN and more national authorities in foreign jurisdictions such as the US CDC, NIH, or FDA.

8  Not wanting to distract from Covid and its implications, it is important to apprehend that NZ academia is not the happy state of scientific inquiry and discovery one might expect. Academics themselves are indicating concern at loss of academic freedom: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/academics-divided-on-their-own-freedoms Also in September 2019 I wrote almost 700 NZ academics forwarding an essay of my discoveries in respect to the 9/11 event – pointing to the false flag and inside job nature of that crime from the perspective of the available public information only to recieive not one response other than “out of the office” type automatic returns. The 9/11 essay for your spare time reading which none have refuted or rebutted: https://values-compasspointsinaposttruthworld.blogspot.com/2019/09/nz-academy-911-militarism-climate-will_11.html If Empire can lie the world into war based on the 9/11 crime lie, then it can lie the world into accepting experimental mRNA gene therapy products for profit and whatever other agendas – none benign.

Friday, 26 November 2021

Why Vaccine Passports 101 - Is "papers please" a health or economic imperative?

In considering the title of any piece of writing it sometimes helps to cut to the bone. 

I could have asserted "Vaccine Passports 101 "Papers please" is not a health imperative it's an economic necessity." 

Vaccine Passports are a richman's trick. 


To move from raising a legitimate question to confidently make the assertion requires evidence and testimony of credible observers and/or researchers and/or whistleblowers (one of the reasons for whistleblower protection law is to encourage disclosure of criminality or malfeasance). 

Where the assertion is proved and the cabal of folk participating in the global health syndicate have hijacked real health to implement an agenda in an undemocratic manner - global coup, the national governments including the New Zealand Government is likely guilty of treason to the New Zealand people where it colludes to strip New Zealand of its free and democratic tradition and impose a new social and political order by decree and trick. 




NZ's Government is using deception to deliver New Zealand and its people into the globalists trap. 

These are serious charges.

I offer my view conscious of the power of those parties who in NZ manifest the Jabberwokey cult of pretend scientism and propagandise the credulous and fearful in the population or team of 5 million. 

NZ's Government have coerced and mandated large segments of the public sector workforce into being injected with Pfizer's mRNA gene therapy.

Please support this petition to the NZ Parliament; "Amend Section 5 and add a new section 5A to the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990"






The injectable is increasingly known as "not safe and not effective"

Pfizer's mRNA injectable is toxic and severely inflammatory in its action in the human body specifically the vascular system with tragic results for thousands either through severe injury and in NZ many hundreds dead post jab. 

Abstract 10712: "Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning," by Steven R Gundry
Originally published 8 Nov 2021 Circulation. 2021;144:A10712


The requirement for boosters is a direct demolition of the notion "that mRNA Covid-19 injectables provide sterilising immunity to Covid-19 infection or symptoms or even death. 

Pfizer's Covid jab doesn't provide sterilising immunity - which is even explicit in Pfizer's trial data.

Data from numerous jurisdictions indicate that Covid-19 injectables are failing to protect those injected.

Third strike is the fact that all other treatment options were banned and discredited by the joint forces of governments, mainstream media news reports, and preferred academics who all parroted the lie there was no alternative cure. These are the same liars that uttered "two weeks to flatten the curve."


Early treatment works and NZ's Government knows that


World Council for Health early treatment guidelines:



We've been lied to by those in authority all the way through the Covid saga or phenomena. 

The mantra "safe and effective" as testified by the  Prime Minister Ardern is a direct lie. 

The same PM  uttered "no we won't be mandating the vaccine in New Zealand" in the year of Our Lord 2020. 

How can any sane person think that the Vaccine Passports are proposed as a temporary measure? 


NZ Covid Traffic Light scheme plan to deliver Vaccine Passports to the whole population

The NZ traffic light system is in effect coercing businesses to be the Government's enforcement arm for their Covid Trojan Horse scam on behalf of Mr Big and the global health syndicate. 

Small and medium enterprises ought take stock that they may be complying their way to their own destruction. 

Private employers and those monopolies such as in plane flights, Air New Zealand are themselves mandating only vaccinated may travel on its flights, or participate in their business or enterprise, and are mandating all employees take the mRNA injectable. 

New Zealand's Government has done everything it 'reasonably' (though I argue unlawfully see petition in my name) could to get New Zealander's jabbed and into the Vaccine Passport scheme.

To assist the case this report is in respect to the global health syndicate and their objectives in using the Covid Trojan horse to implement full spectrum human health and data securitisation. Most of the information is now publicly available. 




A few fundamentals such as the contract big pharma corps demand governments sign are yet to be fully disclosed though we do have representative examples that are credible and likely similar to that which NZ's Government signed with Pfizer;



Why Vaccine Passports 101

Melissa Ciummei summarises the case from her perspective as an investor and ethical human being - she is excellent. 

Melissa Ciummei, a financial investor from Northern Ireland, has serious concerns that injection passports will be used more like data passports to control participation in society. 

She asserts that this passport system was manufactured in order to help bring about a financial reset, replacing our failing fiat currency system.

Because passports are so crucial for the successful implementation of this new financial system, mandatory vaccination of all citizens, young and old, will be imperative for the plan to succeed. 



Following are links to more material gathered by analysts and researchers sceptics of the Corona narrative who have dug into aspects of the Covid scam.


The global health syndicate revealed - "Analysis of the Corona network"

Link is to a 169 page pdf of the various public, private and NGO or philanthropic organisations involved with Corona or promoting "vaccination as cure to everything" shows connections between the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, WHO, GAVI and other NGOs and Big Pharma... It contains round about 6500 objects including like Persons, NGOs, Companies, Documents, etc. It also includes more than 7200 links between them. All information is publicly available;



"Health Emergency or Seizure of Power"  by Kees Van der Pijl 2020, NewColdWar.org 



Dr David Martin The Fauci Dossier 


A summary version of The Fauci Dossier



Berlin Corona Committee

Corona Investigative Committee English website:  https://corona-ausschuss.de/en/ 

Since mid-July 2020, the Corona Committee has been conducting live, multi-hour sessions to investigate why federal and state governments imposed unprecedented restrictions as part of the Coronavirus response and what the consequences have been and still are for people.

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, an experienced trial lawyer licensed in Germany and California (USA) and co-founder of the Berlin Corona Committee, summarizes the Committee's findings to date and takes stock of the situation, published September 16th, 2021. Reiner refers to the global health syndicate as "Mr. Global."




Follow the Money

The above are further partnered and connected in the following analysis by Fabio Vighi 

Follow the money

In pre-Covid times, the world economy was on the verge of another colossal meltdown. Here is a brief chronicle of how the pressure was building up:

June 2019: In its Annual Economic Report, the Swiss-based Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the ‘Central Bank of all central banks’, sets the international alarm bells ringing. The document highlights “overheating […] in the leveraged loan market”, where “credit standards have been deteriorating” and “collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) have surged – reminiscent of the steep rise in collateralized debt obligations [CDOs] that amplified the subprime crisis [in 2008].” Simply stated, the belly of the financial industry is once again full of junk.

9 August 2019: The BIS issues a working paper calling for “unconventional monetary policy measures” to “insulate the real economy from further deterioration in financial conditions”. The paper indicates that, by offering “direct credit to the economy” during a crisis, central bank lending “can replace commercial banks in providing loans to firms.”

15 August 2019: Blackrock Inc., the world’s most powerful investment fund (managing around $7 trillion in stock and bond funds), issues a white paper titled Dealing with the next downturn. Essentially, the paper instructs the US Federal Reserve to inject liquidity directly into the financial system to prevent “a dramatic downturn.” Again, the message is unequivocal: “An unprecedented response is needed when monetary policy is exhausted and fiscal policy alone is not enough. That response will likely involve ‘going direct’”: “finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders” while avoiding “hyperinflation. Examples include the Weimar Republic in the 1920s as well as Argentina and Zimbabwe more recently.”

22-24 August 2019: G7 central bankers meet in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, to discuss BlackRock’s paper along with urgent measures to prevent the looming meltdown. In the prescient words of James Bullard, President of the St Louis Federal Reserve: “We just have to stop thinking that next year things are going to be normal.”

15-16 September 2019: The downturn is officially inaugurated by a sudden spike in the repo rates (from 2% to 10.5%). ‘Repo’ is shorthand for ‘repurchase agreement’, a contract where investment funds lend money against collateral assets (normally Treasury securities). At the time of the exchange, financial operators (banks) undertake to buy back the assets at a higher price, typically overnight. In brief, repos are short-term collateralized loans. They are the main source of funding for traders in most markets, especially the derivatives galaxy. A lack of liquidity in the repo market can have a devastating domino effect on all major financial sectors.

17 September 2019: The Fed begins the emergency monetary programme, pumping hundreds of billions of dollars per week into Wall Street, effectively executing BlackRock’s “going direct” plan. (Unsurprisingly, in March 2020 the Fed will hire BlackRock to manage the bailout package in response to the ‘COVID-19 crisis’).

19 September 2019: Donald Trump signs Executive Order 13887, establishing a National Influenza Vaccine Task Force whose aim is to develop a “5-year national plan (Plan) to promote the use of more agile and scalable vaccine manufacturing technologies and to accelerate development of vaccines that protect against many or all influenza viruses.” This is to counteract “an influenza pandemic”, which, “unlike seasonal influenza […] has the potential to spread rapidly around the globe, infect higher numbers of people, and cause high rates of illness and death in populations that lack prior immunity”. As someone guessed, the pandemic was imminent, while in Europe too preparations were underway (see here and here).

18 October 2019: In New York, a global zoonotic pandemic is simulated during Event 201, a strategic exercise coordinated by the Johns Hopkins Biosecurity Center and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

21-24 January 2020: The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting takes place in Davos, Switzerland, where both the economy and vaccinations are discussed.

23 January 2020: China puts Wuhan and other cities of the Hubei province in lockdown.

11 March 2020: The WHO’s director general calls Covid-19 a pandemic. The rest is history.

Joining the dots is a simple enough exercise. If we do so, we might see a well-defined narrative outline emerge, whose succinct summary reads as follows: lockdowns and the global suspension of economic transactions were intended to 1) Allow the Fed to flood the ailing financial markets with freshly printed money while deferring hyperinflation; and 2) Introduce mass vaccination programmes and health passports as pillars of a neo-feudal regime of capitalist accumulation. As we shall see, the two aims merge into one.


Read the rest of the analysis here: 

https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-self-fulfilling-prophecy-systemic-collapse-and-pandemic-simulation/ 

If one is not part of the solution one is complicit in the crime of the millennium the formal enslavement of humanity to the masters of the universe.

If you feel this is important please support this petition to the NZ Parliament; "Amend Section 5 and add a new section 5A to the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990"


Explanation of the proposed amendment in this blogger: 




What future do you want for your children?  

Papers please or..